A couple of years ago, there was a great deal of controversy because of claims made by Toronto police that Star Trek was linked to pedophilia and sex fetishes, and that it served as an unhealthy outlet for male rape fantasies. According to Dr. Peter Mezan, a psychoanalyst in New York City, "There is an impulse that is common to perversion and to utopian thinking. The wish is to create a world in which differences make no difference. The great utopian thinkers have been immensely inspiring, but there is a reason that utopian communities have never worked out. In the name of equality of every sort and in the attempt to eliminate the tensions that normally divide us, they propose to create a marvelously unnatural world without the usual boundaries. But then it gets all fucked up."
I have included links to these images of women in sci-fi tv, to point out the likelihood of their being some truth to the Toronto police's assertions. Science fiction television and films have been at the forefront of objectifying women, treating them as mere sex objects, rather than as fully developed human beings with minds all of their own. Science fiction television officially condemns rape (see the episode "Violations" of TNG), but itself dresses women in outfits that urge men to merely view thse women as sexual playthings. This does not mean, of course, that women can't or shouldn't wear revealing clothing. I have no problem with that. What I do have a problem with is women having to do so as a prerequisite of their job, for no artistic point. Again, situations vary. The sexuality in "The Devils" for instance, is about as strong as any seen in Western film, but the movie serves as a quite clear condemnation of the enforced chastity of nuns during 17th century France. I would argue that it is therefore justified. Princess Lea sporting a slave girl outfit, by contrast, clearly was meant only to entice male viewers with dreams of chaining a woman by the neck. It is S & M for the kiddie set, and I'm not sure I'm really comfortable with that.
It is entirely possible to make women sexually appealing and yet not exploit them at the same time. One of the finest examples of this process occurred in the original V, in which Faye Grant played Julie Parrish, a sexy resistance leader who nevertheless was not their for eye candy, but served as an example of an intelligent, charming, and important part of the cast. Delenn in Babylon 5, or Starbuck in the reboot of the new BSG also don't always take their clothes off, and yet still remain fundamentally attractive women.
Is science fiction linked to rape? It's hard to say. But clearly, trating women as pinup posters for alien sex fantasies may not be the ideal way of promoting a healthy view of the female body. If science fiction is to sincerely protest rape, it must also protest the pornographization of the female body that creates the sexist attitudes that cause rape. Otherwise, science fiction is merely reinforcing societal prejudices, not liberating us from them.
I suppose I consider myself a pro-porn feminist since I'm not particularly anti-porn. I'm not religious or remotely conservative.
ReplyDeleteThat being said, I don't see the point of purposeful semi-nudity designed to titillate within ordinary stories.
The examples you cite automatically pulls the female character out of serious lead woman into somewhat of a joke character.
This is one reason I am often annoyed with female characters in comics and anime. The half nudity is impractical for fighting and reduces the coolness of the chick.
I must digress about sex scenes in movies as it is a pet peeve of mine.
I think that sex scenes are a waste of screen time in a non-porn movie. I don't see why the same thing couldn't be accomplished with a make-out scene then fade to black. Movies are expensive and every second needs to move the plot or character and nookie doesn't do either efficiently in 99% of cases.
I think I'm rambling now. Time to end comment.
Hey Nick,
ReplyDeleteI'm religious, but not fanatically so (in fact, I was an agnostic up till about 2 weeks ago, though i grew up evangelical). My stance against pornography has more to do with feminism than religious values, in any case. I agree that in most cases sex scenes in movies are a waste of time: the sex scene in the first Terminator movie, for instance, is a perfect example. In the Devils and in the film The Rapture, plot elements are conveyed through these scenes that could not be conveyed any other way (for instance, the Rape of Christ scene in the Devils). The vast majority of movies, however, do not need sex scenes to convey romance, and in fact would be better off without them.
The sex scene in the second matrix movie wasn't awkward at all.
ReplyDeleteI think Star Trek TOS was more guilty of this than anything that came behind it. I find objectifying women in scifi realistic as they are objectified now and I can't really see that changing. I actually think more men are objectified and that trend is continuing upwards. What will happen when we are a society that objectifies all the pretty people?